<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Year&#8217;s Re-Solutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writerdad.com/etcetera/new-years-re-solutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writerdad.com/etcetera/new-years-re-solutions/</link>
	<description>Life is better with the right words.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 09:19:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naomi</title>
		<link>http://writerdad.com/etcetera/new-years-re-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-26598</link>
		<dc:creator>Naomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerdad.com/?p=1910#comment-26598</guid>
		<description>I love the idea to split the year into 4 quarters ... and base your re-solutions on that (LOVE the re-SOLUTIONS wording!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My simple hopes are to reign in and better manage my budget ... and be more present for my family.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Naomi&#8217;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://naomidoesfrugal.blogspot.com/2009/01/jan-2.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jan. 2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the idea to split the year into 4 quarters &#8230; and base your re-solutions on that (LOVE the re-SOLUTIONS wording!)</p>
<p>My simple hopes are to reign in and better manage my budget &#8230; and be more present for my family.</p>
<p>&lt;abbr&gt;<em>Naomi&#8217;s last blog post..<a href="http://naomidoesfrugal.blogspot.com/2009/01/jan-2.html" rel="nofollow">Jan. 2</a></em>&lt;/abbr&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writer Dad</title>
		<link>http://writerdad.com/etcetera/new-years-re-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-4149</link>
		<dc:creator>Writer Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerdad.com/?p=1910#comment-4149</guid>
		<description>Kip de Moll:  I just made a note to check out your song tomorrow, Kip.  I&#039;m looking forward to it!

Glen:  Not a stupid question at all.  I know of no resource like that.  Google has made me exceedingly lazy.  Whenever I have a question like that, I just ask the overlords of the giant G and they bestow upon me an answer.  That would be a really cool resource to put together, though.

Systeria:  I think, for me anyway, it&#039;s depth more than length.  I don&#039;t know about you, but I haven&#039;t read a lot of good fiction online.  When I&#039;m online, I read a lot of worthy material, but a lot of it is functional text.  There isn&#039;t a lot of escapism going on.  When I say I want to read old fashioned books more, I&#039;m saying that I want to get lost in a story or pulled along in dialogue.  I&#039;m of the minority opinion that fiction will make it&#039;s way to the digital domain eventually, but it isn&#039;t there yet, and as of now, I miss curling up with good ink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kip de Moll:  I just made a note to check out your song tomorrow, Kip.  I&#8217;m looking forward to it!</p>
<p>Glen:  Not a stupid question at all.  I know of no resource like that.  Google has made me exceedingly lazy.  Whenever I have a question like that, I just ask the overlords of the giant G and they bestow upon me an answer.  That would be a really cool resource to put together, though.</p>
<p>Systeria:  I think, for me anyway, it&#8217;s depth more than length.  I don&#8217;t know about you, but I haven&#8217;t read a lot of good fiction online.  When I&#8217;m online, I read a lot of worthy material, but a lot of it is functional text.  There isn&#8217;t a lot of escapism going on.  When I say I want to read old fashioned books more, I&#8217;m saying that I want to get lost in a story or pulled along in dialogue.  I&#8217;m of the minority opinion that fiction will make it&#8217;s way to the digital domain eventually, but it isn&#8217;t there yet, and as of now, I miss curling up with good ink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writer Dad</title>
		<link>http://writerdad.com/etcetera/new-years-re-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-37173</link>
		<dc:creator>Writer Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerdad.com/?p=1910#comment-37173</guid>
		<description>Kip de Moll:  I just made a note to check out your song tomorrow, Kip.  I&#039;m looking forward to it!

Glen:  Not a stupid question at all.  I know of no resource like that.  Google has made me exceedingly lazy.  Whenever I have a question like that, I just ask the overlords of the giant G and they bestow upon me an answer.  That would be a really cool resource to put together, though.

Systeria:  I think, for me anyway, it&#039;s depth more than length.  I don&#039;t know about you, but I haven&#039;t read a lot of good fiction online.  When I&#039;m online, I read a lot of worthy material, but a lot of it is functional text.  There isn&#039;t a lot of escapism going on.  When I say I want to read old fashioned books more, I&#039;m saying that I want to get lost in a story or pulled along in dialogue.  I&#039;m of the minority opinion that fiction will make it&#039;s way to the digital domain eventually, but it isn&#039;t there yet, and as of now, I miss curling up with good ink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kip de Moll:  I just made a note to check out your song tomorrow, Kip.  I&#8217;m looking forward to it!</p>
<p>Glen:  Not a stupid question at all.  I know of no resource like that.  Google has made me exceedingly lazy.  Whenever I have a question like that, I just ask the overlords of the giant G and they bestow upon me an answer.  That would be a really cool resource to put together, though.</p>
<p>Systeria:  I think, for me anyway, it&#8217;s depth more than length.  I don&#8217;t know about you, but I haven&#8217;t read a lot of good fiction online.  When I&#8217;m online, I read a lot of worthy material, but a lot of it is functional text.  There isn&#8217;t a lot of escapism going on.  When I say I want to read old fashioned books more, I&#8217;m saying that I want to get lost in a story or pulled along in dialogue.  I&#8217;m of the minority opinion that fiction will make it&#8217;s way to the digital domain eventually, but it isn&#8217;t there yet, and as of now, I miss curling up with good ink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writer Dad</title>
		<link>http://writerdad.com/etcetera/new-years-re-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-37174</link>
		<dc:creator>Writer Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerdad.com/?p=1910#comment-37174</guid>
		<description>Kip de Moll:  I just made a note to check out your song tomorrow, Kip.  I&#039;m looking forward to it!

Glen:  Not a stupid question at all.  I know of no resource like that.  Google has made me exceedingly lazy.  Whenever I have a question like that, I just ask the overlords of the giant G and they bestow upon me an answer.  That would be a really cool resource to put together, though.

Systeria:  I think, for me anyway, it&#039;s depth more than length.  I don&#039;t know about you, but I haven&#039;t read a lot of good fiction online.  When I&#039;m online, I read a lot of worthy material, but a lot of it is functional text.  There isn&#039;t a lot of escapism going on.  When I say I want to read old fashioned books more, I&#039;m saying that I want to get lost in a story or pulled along in dialogue.  I&#039;m of the minority opinion that fiction will make it&#039;s way to the digital domain eventually, but it isn&#039;t there yet, and as of now, I miss curling up with good ink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kip de Moll:  I just made a note to check out your song tomorrow, Kip.  I&#8217;m looking forward to it!</p>
<p>Glen:  Not a stupid question at all.  I know of no resource like that.  Google has made me exceedingly lazy.  Whenever I have a question like that, I just ask the overlords of the giant G and they bestow upon me an answer.  That would be a really cool resource to put together, though.</p>
<p>Systeria:  I think, for me anyway, it&#8217;s depth more than length.  I don&#8217;t know about you, but I haven&#8217;t read a lot of good fiction online.  When I&#8217;m online, I read a lot of worthy material, but a lot of it is functional text.  There isn&#8217;t a lot of escapism going on.  When I say I want to read old fashioned books more, I&#8217;m saying that I want to get lost in a story or pulled along in dialogue.  I&#8217;m of the minority opinion that fiction will make it&#8217;s way to the digital domain eventually, but it isn&#8217;t there yet, and as of now, I miss curling up with good ink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Systeria</title>
		<link>http://writerdad.com/etcetera/new-years-re-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-4148</link>
		<dc:creator>Systeria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerdad.com/?p=1910#comment-4148</guid>
		<description>I like the &#039;I will never be half the writer I wish to be unless I return to the writer I once was&#039;.  Resonates with me.

Still, it does raise the question for me, as to why we&#039;re still drawing a line between digital reading and the reading of good ol&#039; fashioned books. Is it a length thing, or a depth thing, or an experience thing?

Understand that I am too, I&#039;m just trying to articulate to myself why, because I&#039;m not making a very good argument to me.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Systeria&#8217;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://alifedesigned.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/my-life-somebody-elses-box/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My Life, Somebody Else’s Box&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the &#8216;I will never be half the writer I wish to be unless I return to the writer I once was&#8217;.  Resonates with me.</p>
<p>Still, it does raise the question for me, as to why we&#8217;re still drawing a line between digital reading and the reading of good ol&#8217; fashioned books. Is it a length thing, or a depth thing, or an experience thing?</p>
<p>Understand that I am too, I&#8217;m just trying to articulate to myself why, because I&#8217;m not making a very good argument to me.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Systeria&#8217;s last blog post..<a href="http://alifedesigned.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/my-life-somebody-elses-box/" rel="nofollow">My Life, Somebody Else’s Box</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Systeria</title>
		<link>http://writerdad.com/etcetera/new-years-re-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-37171</link>
		<dc:creator>Systeria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerdad.com/?p=1910#comment-37171</guid>
		<description>I like the &#039;I will never be half the writer I wish to be unless I return to the writer I once was&#039;.  Resonates with me.

Still, it does raise the question for me, as to why we&#039;re still drawing a line between digital reading and the reading of good ol&#039; fashioned books. Is it a length thing, or a depth thing, or an experience thing?

Understand that I am too, I&#039;m just trying to articulate to myself why, because I&#039;m not making a very good argument to me.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Systeria&#8217;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://alifedesigned.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/my-life-somebody-elses-box/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My Life, Somebody Else’s Box&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the &#8216;I will never be half the writer I wish to be unless I return to the writer I once was&#8217;.  Resonates with me.</p>
<p>Still, it does raise the question for me, as to why we&#8217;re still drawing a line between digital reading and the reading of good ol&#8217; fashioned books. Is it a length thing, or a depth thing, or an experience thing?</p>
<p>Understand that I am too, I&#8217;m just trying to articulate to myself why, because I&#8217;m not making a very good argument to me.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Systeria&#8217;s last blog post..<a href="http://alifedesigned.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/my-life-somebody-elses-box/" rel="nofollow">My Life, Somebody Else’s Box</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Systeria</title>
		<link>http://writerdad.com/etcetera/new-years-re-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-37172</link>
		<dc:creator>Systeria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerdad.com/?p=1910#comment-37172</guid>
		<description>I like the &#039;I will never be half the writer I wish to be unless I return to the writer I once was&#039;.  Resonates with me.

Still, it does raise the question for me, as to why we&#039;re still drawing a line between digital reading and the reading of good ol&#039; fashioned books. Is it a length thing, or a depth thing, or an experience thing?

Understand that I am too, I&#039;m just trying to articulate to myself why, because I&#039;m not making a very good argument to me.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Systeria&#8217;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://alifedesigned.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/my-life-somebody-elses-box/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My Life, Somebody Else’s Box&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the &#8216;I will never be half the writer I wish to be unless I return to the writer I once was&#8217;.  Resonates with me.</p>
<p>Still, it does raise the question for me, as to why we&#8217;re still drawing a line between digital reading and the reading of good ol&#8217; fashioned books. Is it a length thing, or a depth thing, or an experience thing?</p>
<p>Understand that I am too, I&#8217;m just trying to articulate to myself why, because I&#8217;m not making a very good argument to me.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Systeria&#8217;s last blog post..<a href="http://alifedesigned.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/my-life-somebody-elses-box/" rel="nofollow">My Life, Somebody Else’s Box</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Allsopp</title>
		<link>http://writerdad.com/etcetera/new-years-re-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-4143</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Allsopp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerdad.com/?p=1910#comment-4143</guid>
		<description>This might seem like a stupid, if not random question, but i thought you would be the best person to ask. Is there a resource out there that breaks all words down into their true meanings?

I.e. I really like seeing things like re-solutions because you see the word in a new light. Just like disease is really formed from dis-ease.

Maybe I&#039;m weird ;)

I would appreciate any resources though...

Cheers,
Glen

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Glen Allsopp&#8217;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pluginid.com/improve-at-anything/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;One Simple Action to Improve at Anything&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might seem like a stupid, if not random question, but i thought you would be the best person to ask. Is there a resource out there that breaks all words down into their true meanings?</p>
<p>I.e. I really like seeing things like re-solutions because you see the word in a new light. Just like disease is really formed from dis-ease.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m weird ;)</p>
<p>I would appreciate any resources though&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Glen</p>
<p><abbr><em>Glen Allsopp&#8217;s last blog post..<a href="http://www.pluginid.com/improve-at-anything/" rel="nofollow">One Simple Action to Improve at Anything</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Allsopp</title>
		<link>http://writerdad.com/etcetera/new-years-re-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-37166</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Allsopp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerdad.com/?p=1910#comment-37166</guid>
		<description>This might seem like a stupid, if not random question, but i thought you would be the best person to ask. Is there a resource out there that breaks all words down into their true meanings?

I.e. I really like seeing things like re-solutions because you see the word in a new light. Just like disease is really formed from dis-ease.

Maybe I&#039;m weird ;)

I would appreciate any resources though...

Cheers,
Glen

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Glen Allsopp&#8217;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pluginid.com/improve-at-anything/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;One Simple Action to Improve at Anything&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might seem like a stupid, if not random question, but i thought you would be the best person to ask. Is there a resource out there that breaks all words down into their true meanings?</p>
<p>I.e. I really like seeing things like re-solutions because you see the word in a new light. Just like disease is really formed from dis-ease.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m weird ;)</p>
<p>I would appreciate any resources though&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Glen</p>
<p><abbr><em>Glen Allsopp&#8217;s last blog post..<a href="http://www.pluginid.com/improve-at-anything/" rel="nofollow">One Simple Action to Improve at Anything</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kip de Moll</title>
		<link>http://writerdad.com/etcetera/new-years-re-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-4135</link>
		<dc:creator>Kip de Moll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writerdad.com/?p=1910#comment-4135</guid>
		<description>Sean,
After 20 years of not playing much music or writing, I didn&#039;t start 2008 with a resolution, but by making a major change in my focus in another area, the creativity just came bursting forth.  What a thrill!  2009 has already kicked off with a new song.  I just posted it on my blog.
It&#039;s been fun watching your determination unleash some great ideas and fine writing.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kip de Moll&#8217;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://piecesofheartvt.blogspot.com/2009/01/perpetual-motion.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Perpetual Motion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,<br />
After 20 years of not playing much music or writing, I didn&#8217;t start 2008 with a resolution, but by making a major change in my focus in another area, the creativity just came bursting forth.  What a thrill!  2009 has already kicked off with a new song.  I just posted it on my blog.<br />
It&#8217;s been fun watching your determination unleash some great ideas and fine writing.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Kip de Moll&#8217;s last blog post..<a href="http://piecesofheartvt.blogspot.com/2009/01/perpetual-motion.html" rel="nofollow">Perpetual Motion</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/18 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 394/400 objects using disk: basic

Served from: writerdad.com @ 2012-05-21 09:27:16 -->
